“Velvet Elvis” is written by Mars Hill Pastor, Rob Bell. My only exposure to Rob Bell prior to reading this book was through his Nooma video series. In those videos, he appeared to be thoughtful, sincere, and more than a little thought provoking. All of these mini-studies were delivered in what would be his trademark, staccato, and dramatic delivery – as though he thinks and speaks in no more than a few words at a time. We had used some of these DVDs in our small group settings and I thought they were interesting so when I saw the book “Velvet Elvis” on the shelf at our local Barnes and Noble, I picked it up.
Right away you get a sense of his speaking style in the book.
It is delivered
Much like
This.
This is of course, his speaking style-
If Captain Kirk wrote a book about God
It might read like this one.
Once you get used to it, it is not really that big a deal, but it is different. It is interesting to see his speaking style carried over into his writing style – at least it is to me.
The book is mainly about the idea that we should “repaint” the Christian faith – make it your own, so to speak – and apply it. There is an overarching theme that we should be more focused on loving and serving people in order to have a positive effect on the world – which is good – but this book sets off a few alarms in my mind. It is a dangerous book, in my opinion.
It is dangerous in that it mixes good points – we should be involved in our world and do more to show the love of Christ – with some really flaky ones that on the surface sound good, but when you think about them and apply Scriptural principles to them – they fail.
For example, early on he creates a metaphorical picture of faith that looks like a trampoline. I liked this example – especially where he speaks of how much easier it is to jump higher when others are jumping with you. Where he loses my interest – and veers off Biblical principle – is when he compares the springs on the trampoline to our doctrines. According to Rob, our doctrines, and hence our faith, should be flexible. The idea is that if we begin to question one of our doctrines, we can still jump on our trampoline of faith unhindered. A lovely idea, right?
He actually says that; to some people – like me – doctrine is:
“… a wall of bricks. Each of the core doctrines for him is like an individual brick that stacks on top of the others. If you pull one out, the whole wall starts to crumble. It appears quite strong and rigid, but if you begin to rethink or discuss even one brick, the whole thing is in danger.”
Of course this leads to …
“…one of the things that happens in ‘brickworld’: you spend a lot of time talking about how right you are. Which of course leads to how wrong everybody else is. Which then leads to defending the wall … you rarely defend a trampoline. You invite people to jump on it with you.”
And defending doctrines is bad because…
“The problem with brickianity is that walls inevitably keep people out. Often it appears as though you have to agree with all of the bricks exactly as they are or you can’t join… Jesus invites everybody to jump.”
He then follows this up with the example of a doctrine that is central to ALL of Christianity – the supernatural birth and nature of Jesus Christ. He poses a question like ”What would happen to your faith if you found empirical evidence that Jesus was not born of a virgin and basically wasn’t who he claimed to be?” It’s a stupid question really – if Jesus wasn’t who he claimed to be, then Christianity doesn’t need to be here.
By asking that question in that context, he implies that faith in the identity of Jesus should be flexible – as if we should want to live the way we do regardless of the truth about Jesus. This is also called – Baloney!
Matthew 16:16-18
Matthew 16:16-18
English: Contemporary English Version (1999) - CEV16 Simon Peter spoke up, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”
17 Jesus told him:
Simon, son of Jonah, you are blessed! You didn't discover this on your own. It was shown to you by my Father in heaven.
18 So I will call you Peter, which means “a rock.” On this rock I will build my church, and death itself will not have any power over it.
clearly states that the church is built upon the “rock” of the revelation of who Jesus is! That doesn’t sound flexible to me. It sounds a whole lot like if Jesus wasn’t the real deal, everything comes crashing down.
+1 point for brick wall doctrines.
Ephesians 2:19-21
Ephesians 2:19-21
English: Contemporary English Version (1999) - CEV19 You Gentiles are no longer strangers and foreigners. You are citizens with everyone else who belongs to the family of God.
20 You are like a building with the apostles and prophets as the foundation and with Christ as the most important stone.
21 Christ is the one who holds the building together and makes it grow into a holy temple for the Lord.
says that the church is built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets with Jesus being the cornerstone. It sounds like if one of the apostles is wrong, a prophet has lied, or Jesus isn’t truly who he says he is, everything comes crashing down.
+1 point for brick wall doctrines.
Jude 1:3
says we should fight for the original faith and teachings of the apostles!
+1 for defending your brick wall.
This is just one example of some of the “Rob Bell” ideas that he puts out there that doesn’t weigh true against Scripture.
He also leans HEAVILY on rabbinical teachings. It’s cool to get some ideas and context from extra-biblical sources, but we have to always be aware that they are extra-biblical. Rob seems to go overboard with his fascination and respect for the rabbis thoughts – even though I don’t know of any Jewish rabbi who agreed with Jesus’ identity or teachings as delivered by his apostles… otherwise, they wouldn’t be a Jewish rabbi would they?
So there were parts that I thought were good – and true – and a whole lot more that sounded philosophical but was really dismissive of Christians having anything resembling a firm foundation of beliefs. Every once in a while, he throws a thought out there that makes you really think “wow, that’s good.” But most often, he just leaves me really wanting to sit down with him and say “Show me the Scripture for that, please.”
Bottom Line: I would prefer revelation and enlightenment of Scripture over extra-biblical, let’s-be-so relevant-to-our-world-that-we-are-irrelevant, everyone has some kind of truth, “what is absolute?” philosophy. Add to that the fact that he has introduced Jewish mysticism and more into his teachings and church, and you get my recommendation of “Don’t buy this book if you are expecting anything else.”